BENNETT v. WOLFE (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Chauncey Demetrius BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden John WOLFE; Librarian June Brittingham; L.T. Vanessa Jones; Secretary Stephen Moyer; Commissioner Dayena Corcoran; Commissioner Carolyn Scrugs, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-6226

Decided: July 20, 2018

Before TRAXLER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Chauncey Demetrius Bennett, Appellant Pro Se.

Chauncey Demetrius Bennett appeals the district court's order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Bennett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and dismissing his claim challenging his infraction without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bennett v. Wolfe, No. 1:16-cv-04069-JKB, 2018 WL 999917 (D. Md. Feb. 20, 2018). We deny Bennett's motion to order defendants to provide a copying card and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network