CUSTIS v. VA DOC (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Ryricka Nikita CUSTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earl BARKSDALE, Warden Red Onion State Prison; M. Younce, A Building Unit Manager Red Onion State Prison; I. Edwards, Records Department Red Onion State Prison; P. Harless, Medical Department Red Onion State Prison; E. Sowards, Defendants-Appellees, Harold Clarke, Director of VA DOC; H. Smith, Doctor Red Onion State Prison, Defendants.

No. 18-6308

Decided: June 27, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Ryricka Nikita Custis, Appellant Pro Se.

Ryricka Nikita Custis appeals the district court's order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Custis v. Barksdale, No. 7:16-cv-00391-EKD-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network