UNITED STATES v. THOMPSON (2018)

Jon Karl Thompson appeals the district court's orders denying his motions for appointment of a guardian ad litem and for transfer to Arkansas. Our review of the record discloses that Thompson failed to demonstrate entitlement to appointment of a guardian ad litem under Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c). Nor has he demonstrated that Arkansas is willing to accept responsibility for his custody, care and treatment. See 18 U.S.C. § 4248(d) (2012). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.