Peter B; Karen W.; Michelle M, Plaintiffs, v. Nikki Randhawa Haley, Defendant. (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

JIMMY CHIP E, Plaintiff-Appellant, Peter B; Karen W.; Michelle M, Plaintiffs, v. Marshall C. SANFORD; Emma Forkner; Beverly Buscemi; Kelly Floyd; South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, the; South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs, the; Anthony Keck; Richard Huntress, Defendants-Appellees, Nikki Randhawa Haley, Defendant.

No. 17-2012

Decided: June 19, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Patricia Logan Harrison, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. William H. Davidson, II, Kenneth P. Woodington, DAVIDSON, WREN & PLYLER, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Jimmy Chip E appeals the district court's order denying his motion for costs and attorney's fees as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. E v. Sanford, No. 6:10-cv-00767-TMC (D.S.C. July 28, 2017). We deny E's motion to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law