Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jose L. FRANCE-BEY, a/k/a Jose L. Espada, Jr.—Bey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenny HOLBROOK; Jason White; Travis Bowman; Brad Cook; Dobson P. D./S.C.S.D., Defendants-Appellees.
Jose L. France-Bey, a/k/a Jose L. Espada, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenny Holbrook; Jason White; Travis Bowman; Brad Cook, Defendants-Appellees, Dobson P. D./S.C.S.D, Defendant.
In these consolidated appeals, Jose L. France-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s September 6, 2017, order dismissing his civil action as to one Defendant without prejudice for failure to obtain service, and the court’s January 11, 2018, judgment adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying France-Bey’s motion to alter or amend judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order and judgment France-Bey seeks to appeal are not final orders or appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We deny France-Bey’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
PER CURIAM:
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-6054, No. 18-6088
Decided: June 04, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)