Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jimmy MULLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY, Defendant-Appellee.
Jimmy Mullins appeals the magistrate judge’s orders entering judgment in favor of the Appellee after a jury trial and denying Mullins’ motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Mullins v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, No. 1:14-cv-02698-TJS, 2017 WL 3394763 (D. Md. Mar. 13 & Aug. 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-2038
Decided: May 10, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)