J and K Cattle; Kevin Van Beek; Jay Leloux, Plaintiffs, v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM VETMEDICA INC (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

FRANKLIN LIVESTOCK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, J and K Cattle; Kevin Van Beek; Jay Leloux, Plaintiffs, v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM VETMEDICA, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-1829

Decided: May 02, 2018

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Alan D. McInnes, Phillip A. Harris, Jr., KILPATRICK TOWNSEND, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Kyle V. Miller, Michael E. McWilliams, BUTLER SNOW LLP, Ridgeland, Mississippi; Alex J. Hagan, Jeremy M. Falcone, ELLIS & WINTERS LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Franklin Livestock, Inc., appeals the district court's orders dismissing its lawsuit as a sanction for discovery abuses and denying its motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's thorough and well-reasoned orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Franklin Livestock, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., 251 F.Supp.3d 962 (E.D.N.C. 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law