SINGLETARY v. LLC 70055FB 201003762 70055FB 2010003762 LB 70055FB 2010003762 70055FB 2010003762 70055FB 2010003762 70055FB 2010003762 70055FB 70055FB 2010003762 WCSC LLC LLC WCSC 70055FB 2010003762 (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

John G. SINGLETARY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON; Mayor Keith Summey; Chief Eddie Driggers; Angela Cartrette, North Charleston Clerk of Court Administrator, Defendants-Appellees, North Charleston Police Department; Officer Jonathan Glenn; Channel 5 News; Raycom Media: Brenda Rindge; Post & Courier: The Evening Post Industries; Cedrus Davis & Floyd; Chicora Gardens LLC, All Jointly & Severally; Eric McClure; Harve Jacobs; North Charleston Legal Department, Law Offices of Brady Hair; Burgess, on 70055FB case history report case #201003762; Linda, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; LB, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; Edwardss, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; Behrenl, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; Quickr, on 70055FB case history report case #2010003762; Officer Cindy Bardallo; Officer Glenn Wille, appearing on original Ticket 70055FB; Unnamed Juvenile Complainant, on 70055FB Incident Media Report case #2010003762; Michael Zoltanski; WCSC Station Manager; Peter Manigault; Charleston County Election Board; Cedrus LLC; Art Titus; Deb Willians; Davis & Floyd; Emmitt Davis, Jr.; Chicora Gardens Holding LLC; Channel 5 News, WCSC; North Charleston Accounting Department; Guthris, on 70055FB case history report case # 2010003762; William Sharpe, Defendants.

No. 17-1569

Decided: April 23, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Mark W. Hardee, THE HARDEE LAW FIRM, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Robin Lilley Jackson, Sandra J. Senn, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

John G. Singletary, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singletary v. The City of N. Charleston, No. 2:15-cv-04463-MBS (D.S.C. June 21, 2016 & Mar. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law