HAMBLEN v. BERRYHILL (2018)

Donna Hamblen appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing as frivolous her civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hamblen's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, Hamblen has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).^* Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   Moreover, to the extent that Hamblen's informal brief may be read as challenging the substance of the district court's ruling, we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing her complaint as frivolous.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.