TWEED v. RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Timothy E. TWEED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL; Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority; Joseph Higgs, Jr., Official and Individual Capacity; Phil Grimes, Official and Individual Capacity; Huston Norris, Official and Individual Capacity; Kalen Donaldson, Official and Individual Capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-1048

Decided: April 24, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Timothy Everette Tweed, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Timothy Everette Tweed appeals the district court's orders: (1) granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging discharge in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634 (West 2008 & Supp. 2017); and denying Tweed's motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tweed v. Rappahannock Reg'l Jail, No. 1:16-cv-01164-LO-MSN, 2017 WL 6395853 (E.D. Va. Dec. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law