PARIKH v. FROSH (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Namish PARIKH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hon. Brian FROSH, In his capacity as Attorney General of Maryland, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-2147

Decided: March 16, 2018

Before TRAXLER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Namish Parikh, Appellant Pro Se. Alexis Burrell Rohde, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Namish Parikh appeals the district court's order dismissing this civil action challenging Maryland's prejudgment attachment procedure under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parikh v. Frosh, No. 8:17-cv-00332-GJH, 2017 WL 4124238 (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law