NEAL v. FCI MCDOWELL (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jamohn A. NEAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FCI MCDOWELL; Doctor A. P. Goode; Officer Lambeth, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-7222

Decided: January 23, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Jamohn A. Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Crews, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Beaver, West Virginia; Matthew Charles Lindsay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Jamohn A. Neal appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and denying relief on his civil action asserting claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record included on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Neal v. FCI McDowell, No. 1:16-cv-11365, 2017 WL 3528671 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network