JOHNSON v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE JP (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Christopher Lee JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Financials; Department of State; Goldman Sachs; JP Morgan Chase; Citigroup; Morgan Stanley; U.S. Treasury Department; Loyd Blank Fien; Jamie Diamon; James Gorman; U.S. Federal Reserve, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-2152

Decided: February 16, 2018

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Christopher Lee Johnson appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Dep't of Justice, No. 6:17-cv-01844-MGL (D.S.C. Aug. 31 & Sept. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law