UNITED STATES v. CROMWELL (2018)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael CROMWELL, a/k/a Mike Tyson, a/k/a Mikey, a/k/a Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-7389

Decided: February 02, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Michael Cromwell, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Michael Cromwell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.^* United States v. Cromwell, No. 2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. Because Cromwell does not challenge on appeal the district court's disposition of his claim based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, he has forfeited appellate review of that issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law