BURL ANDERSON HOWELL ALICE ANNETTE HOWELL v. DANIEL HORNE JR (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

BURL ANDERSON HOWELL; ALICE ANNETTE HOWELL, Plaintiff - Appellants, v. DANIEL M. HORNE, JR., Defendant - Appellee.

No. 17-2000

Decided: December 22, 2017

Burl Anderson Howell, Alice A. Howell, Appellants Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Burl Anderson Howell and Alice Annette Howell appeal the district court's order dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howell v. Horne, No. 5:17-cv-00126-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law