BRADLEY WILLIS v. ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY MARYLAND (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

BRADLEY WILLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 17-1438

Decided: December 13, 2017

Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Joyce E. Smithey, Reuben W. Wolfson, RIFKIN WEINER LIVINGSTON LLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Nancy McCutchan Duden, County Attorney, Kelly C. Lovett, Senior Assistant County Attorney, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.

Bradley Willis appeals the district court's order granting Anne Arundel County, Maryland, summary judgment on his discriminatory discipline claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017); Md. Code Ann., State Gov't Title 20 (West 2017); Md. Const. Decl. of Rights, art. 24; and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Willis v. Anne Arundel Cty., Md., No. 1:16-cv-01388-JKB (D. Md. March 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law