DARREL WHITE v. ADAMS DAVID ROBINSON WITT (2017)

Darrel A. White appeals the district court's order ^* granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees in White's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Jackson, No. 2:16-cv-00597-MSD-LRL (E.D. Va. June 28, 2017). We grant White's motion for leave to use the original record but deny his motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE.   We construe White's informal brief as also challenging the district court's December 22, 2016, and March 29, 2017, orders. While we conclude that we have jurisdiction to review those orders, see Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 176-77 (4th Cir. 2015) (discussing compliance with Fed. R. App. P. 3), White has forfeited appellate review of the December 22 order, see id. at 177 (limiting appellate review to issues raised in informal brief). Further, contrary to White's apparent assertion on appeal, the March 29 order did not rule that any of his claims should be rejected for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

PER CURIAM: