PIPER ANN ROUNTREE v. HAROLD CLARKE CHARLENE DAVIS PHYLLIS BASKERVILLE GARY BASS TAMMY BROWN LOUIS CEI UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FAITH REVIEW COMMITTEE MICHAEL SHUPE LAYTON LESTER (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

PIPER ANN ROUNTREE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections; CHARLENE DAVIS, Assistant to Gary L. Bass, Virginia Department of Corrections; PHYLLIS BASKERVILLE, Prior Warden, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women; GARY L. BASS, Regional Adminstrator Virginia Department of Corrections; TAMMY BROWN, Warden, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women; LOUIS B. CEI; UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS' FAITH REVIEW COMMITTEE; MICHAEL SHUPE; LAYTON LESTER, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 17-6677

Decided: October 03, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Piper Ann Rountree, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Haeberle Cahill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Piper Ann Rountree appeals the district court's orders denying relief on her civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc–5 (2012), and denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rountree v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00220-GEC-RSB (W.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2016; Feb. 16, 2017; Apr. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law