DANIEL ROSE v. COLSTON JONES KATHLEEN ORTIZ (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

DANIEL ROSE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. COLSTON JONES, Lawyer, Public Defender; KATHLEEN A. ORTIZ, Lawyer, Public Defender, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 17-6675

Decided: September 28, 2017

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Daniel Rose, Appellant Pro Se.

Daniel Rose appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rose v. Jones, No. 2:17-cv-00226-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. filed May 15, 2017, entered May 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network