GERALD FULLER v. WARDEN FRANK BISHOP JR II LARRY HANLIN SUPERVISOR KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK SALES (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

GERALD D. FULLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.; F.S.C. II LARRY D. HANLIN; SUPERVISOR; KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK SALES, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 17-6423

Decided: September 22, 2017

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Gerald D. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Gerald Davis Fuller appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to defendants in his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fuller v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-02524-WMN (D. Md. Jan. 27 & Mar. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law