MIRNA RODRIQUEZ v. ERIC FANNING (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

MIRNA RODRIQUEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ERIC K. FANNING, Secretary of the Army, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 17-1083

Decided: September 21, 2017

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Robert L. Jenkins, Jr., BYNUM & JENKINS, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Kimere J. Kimball, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Mirna Rodriquez appeals the district court's orders deeming the Appellee's statement of undisputed facts as admitted and denying reconsideration, and granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Rodriquez's claims of discrimination and

retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rodriquez v. Fanning, No. 1:15-cv-01654-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. Nov. 22 & Dec. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law