FATIMA MUSTAFA KAMAL MUSTAFA v. PENNYMAC CORP (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

FATIMA MUSTAFA; KAMAL MUSTAFA, Debtors - Appellants, v. PENNYMAC CORP., by PennyMac Loan Services, its Servicing Agent, Creditor - Appellee,
TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee. FATIMA MUSTAFA; KAMAL MUSTAFA, Debtors - Appellants, v. PMT NPL FINANCING 2015-1, by PennyMac Loan Services, LLC, Its Servicing Agent, Creditor - Appellee, TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Trustee,

No. 17-1414, No. 17-1416

Decided: August 28, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Fatima Mustafa, Kamal Mustafa, Appellants Pro Se. Christina Marie Williamson, BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

In these consolidated appeals, Fatima and Kamal Mustafa appeal from the district court's orders affirming two orders of the bankruptcy court granting the Appellees' motion for relief from the automatic stay in order to proceed with post-foreclosure sale actions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mustafa v. PennyMac Corp., No. 8:16-cv-00494-PJM.; Mustafa v. PMT NPL Financing, No. 8:16-cv-00523-PJM (D. Md. Filed Mar. 29, 2017, and entered Mar. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law