GEORGE MCDERMOTT v. STATE OF VIRGINIA COA USA CITY OF ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA COA USA FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FBI USA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DOJ USA (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER, (JWG) Relator, Ex rel United States of America (USA), Plaintiff, GEORGE MCDERMOTT, Intervenor - Appellant, v. STATE OF VIRGINIA, (COA) C/O City Attorney James Bank, Their public servants, as individuals & in their official capacity as an officer of the Court, gov't employee, elected officials. Those listed below working as public servants for mentioned St/dept of USA; CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA (COA) C/O City Attorney James Bank, Their public servants, as individuals & in their official capacity as an officer of the Court, gov't employee, elected officials. Those listed below working as public servants for mentioned St/dept of USA; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, (FBI) C/O James Comey, Their public servants, as individuals & in their official capacity as an officer of the Court, government employee, elected officials. Those listed below working as public servants for the mentioned St/dept of the USA; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, (DOJ) C/O Acting Chief Justice, Their public servants, as individuals & in their official capacity as an officer of the Court, government employee, elected officials. Those listed below working as public servants for the mentioned St/dept of the USA, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 17-1335

Decided: August 28, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

George Edward McDermott, Appellant Pro Se.

George Edward McDermott appeals the district court's order denying his motions to intervene and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McDermott v. Virginia, No. 1:17-cv-00166-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Mar. 1 & 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law