THEODUS LINDSAY JR v. WILLIAM GLICK III MR BRANDHORST MS BARRINGER CORDELIA MCBRIDE EBONY RATLIFF MR HILDRETH MR HUNEYCUTT MS ROBINSON MR LOOKABILL MS BRUTON MR PARSONS MR HARGRAVE MR BRADFORD MACRE CRIDER VICTOR LOCKLEAR MONICA BOND (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

THEODUS LINDSAY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM GLICK, III; MR. BRANDHORST; MS. BARRINGER; CORDELIA MCBRIDE; EBONY RATLIFF; MR. HILDRETH; MR. HUNEYCUTT; MS. ROBINSON; MR. LOOKABILL; MS. BRUTON; MR. PARSONS; MR. HARGRAVE; MR. BRADFORD; MACRE CRIDER; VICTOR LOCKLEAR; MONICA BOND, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 17-6400

Decided: August 25, 2017

Before SHEDD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Theodus Lindsay, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tammera Sudderth Hill, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Theodus Lindsay, Jr., appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lindsay's motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lindsay v. Glick, No. 1:15-cv-00596-LCB-JLW (M.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law