IN RE: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray, Petitioner.

No. 17-1223

Decided: June 23, 2017

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Edward Chestnut, Petitioner Pro Se.

Raymond Edward Chestnut petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the district court to act on his Motion to Vacate Stay Order. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court has denied the motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law