Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DIAMOND FALLS ESTATES, LLC; SHIRLEY M. BUAFO; CHARLES K. BUAFO, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. NANTAHALA BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Defendant – Appellee, STEVE E. GRAVETT; EXCELL PARTNERS, LLC; JANE/JOHN DOES; LUXUR, INC.; REALTY ACQUISITIONS, LLC, Defendants.
This case arises under diversity of citizenship jurisdiction and involves a loan that the Appellants, Diamond Falls Estates, LLC, Shirley M. Buafo, and Charles K. Buafo, obtained from Nantahala Bank & Trust Company (“Nantahala”) to develop a North Carolina property. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Nantahala on the Appellants' claims and on Nantahala's counterclaims.
Appellants present the following issues for our review:
I. Whether the district court erred by granting Nantahala's motion for summary judgment on the breach of contract claim;
II. Whether the district court erred by granting Nantahala's motion for summary judgment on the breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud claims;
III. Whether the district court erred by granting Nantahala's motion for summary judgment on the negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation claims; and
IV. Whether the district court erred by granting Nantahala's motion for summary judgment on the unfair and deceptive trade practices claim.
Having had the benefit of full briefing and oral argument, and having fully considered the parties' contentions, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough memorandum opinion. Diamond Falls Estates, LLC v. Nantahala Bank & Trust Co., No. 2:14-cv-00007-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2015).
AFFIRMED
PER CURIAM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 15-2210
Decided: April 07, 2017
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)