CHRISTOPHER ODOM v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA JASON KING CHARLES PATRICK JUDGE MULLINS SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD JUDGE JAMES GOSNELL MAYOR JOE RILEY GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY MAYOR KEITH SUMNEY JUDGE GARFINKEL JUDGE KRISTI HARRINGTON JUDGE JEFFERSON STATE ATTORNEY ALAN WILSON ASHLEY PENNINGTON PROSECUTOR SCARLETT WILSON MICHAEL GRANT MUSC DOLLAR TREE CARTA BUS CO CARTA BUS WHEELCHAIR LIFT MANUFACTURER CARTA BUS INSURER CARTA BUS DRIVER OFFICER CHERRY OFFICER HO UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICER 16 2014 OFFICER TUGYA CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF CHARLESTON TAXPAYERS STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA TAXPAYERS COUNTY OF CHARLESTON TAXPAYERS CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON TAXPAYERS FNU LNU DR STEPHANIE MONTGOMERY CHAMPUS FNU LNU MUSC SCDMH (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; JASON KING, Public Defender; CHARLES PATRICK, Solicitor; JUDGE MULLINS; SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD; JUDGE JAMES GOSNELL; MAYOR JOE RILEY, City of Charleston; GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY; MAYOR KEITH SUMNEY, North Charleston; JUDGE GARFINKEL; JUDGE KRISTI HARRINGTON; JUDGE JEFFERSON; STATE ATTORNEY ALAN WILSON; P.D. ASHLEY PENNINGTON; PROSECUTOR SCARLETT WILSON; MICHAEL GRANT; MUSC; DOLLAR TREE; CARTA BUS CO.; CARTA BUS WHEELCHAIR LIFT MANUFACTURER; CARTA BUS INSURER; CARTA BUS DRIVER; OFFICER CHERRY, of Charleston Police Dep't; OFFICER HO, of Charleston Police Dep't; UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICER, with Officer Ho on Dec. 16, 2014; OFFICER TUGYA, of Charleston Police Dep't; CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHARLESTON TAXPAYERS; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA TAXPAYERS; COUNTY OF CHARLESTON TAXPAYERS; CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON TAXPAYERS; FNU LNU, Female Victim Advocate; DR. STEPHANIE MONTGOMERY; CHAMPUS, Insurer; FNU LNU, Doctors from MUSC who approved placement of Plaintiff in SCDMH, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 16-2121

Decided: February 16, 2017

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se.

Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation, dismissing Odom's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012), and imposing a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in formal pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. South Carolina, No. 5:16-cv-02674-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law