ALFRED WILLIAM LASURE v. SC MENTAL HEALTH CYNTHIA HELFF JOHN MCGILL (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

ALFRED WILLIAM LASURE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SC MENTAL HEALTH; CYNTHIA HELFF, Program Director, Individually and in her Official Capacity; JOHN MCGILL, State Director, In his Official and Individual Capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 16-7338

Decided: February 03, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Alfred LaSure, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Albert Kinney, Jr., Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY LAW FIRM, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Alfred William LaSure appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, as modified, and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. LaSure v. SC Mental Health, No. 9:15-cv-01357-RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2016). In light of this disposition, we deny as moot the Appellees' motion to strike LaSure's second informal opening brief and amended informal opening brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law