UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMAL ALFRED JA (2016)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JAMAL H. ALFRED, a/k/a Joshua Al Hall, a/k/a JA, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 16-7163

Decided: December 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Jamal H. Alfred, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. O'Malley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Jamal H. Alfred appeals from the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.^* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. United States v. Alfred, No. 3:03-cr-00017-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. Although the district court granted Alfred's § 3582(c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Alfred's sentence to the full extent he requested.

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network