RONNIE LEE ALSTON v. THOMAS DORE CHARLES HIRSCH (2016)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

RONNIE LEE ALSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THOMAS P. DORE, Substitute Trustees, et al.; CHARLES HIRSCH, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 16-1894

Decided: December 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Ronnie Lee Alston, Appellant Pro Se.

Ronnie Lee Alston appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Dore, No. 8:15-cv-02635-GJH (D. Md. Oct. 6, 2015, July 29, 2016). We deny Alston's motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law