UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SAMUEL RODNEY HOLMES (2016)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMUEL RODNEY HOLMES, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 16-6635

Decided: November 18, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Samuel Rodney Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Zalkin Hitt, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Samuel Rodney Holmes appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration of its earlier order granting him a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). In the prior order, the district court reduced his sentence to the bottom of his amended Guidelines range. In his motion for reconsideration, Holmes sought a further reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Holmes, No. 1:05-cr-01253-MBS-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2016; Nov. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law