Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
AURORA JULIAN ROCKEFELLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES CARTER, former U.S. President; CIA AGENTS; U.S. CONSULS, at Manila U.S. Embassy during Carter Administration, Defendants - Appellees.
Aurora Julian Rockefeller appeals the district court's orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012), and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Rockefeller v. Carter, No. 2:14-cv-07528 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 18, 2016; May 10, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 16-1796
Decided: October 03, 2016
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)