SHAN EDWARD CARTER v. CARLTON JOYNER (2016)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

SHAN EDWARD CARTER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CARLTON B. JOYNER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent - Appellee.

No. 16-14

Decided: September 14, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Shan Edward Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Shan Edward Carter appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice Carter's “Memorandum of Pro Se Defendant's Intent to Request Appointment of Independent, qualified ‘Martinez’ counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599(b) thru (d).” The district court dismissed the action as premature after Carter confirmed that he did not wish to file a federal habeas corpus petition and had not exhausted his state court remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. Joyner, No. 5:16-hc-02108-D (E.D.N.C. June 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network