CHRIS MURRAY v. LORETTA LYNCH IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT ICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (2016)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

CHRIS MURRAY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General; IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT - (ICE); UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondents - Appellees.

No. 16-6585

Decided: August 30, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Chris Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Chris Murray appeals the district court's order granting the Government's motion to dismiss in his action seeking mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Murray v. Lynch, No. 8:14-cv-03865-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law