FREDERICK HOWELL v. ALAN WILSON (2016)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

FREDERICK L. HOWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ALAN WILSON, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 16-6111

Decided: June 28, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Frederick L. Howell, Appellant Pro Se.

Frederick L. Howell appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howell v. Wilson, No. 4:15-cv-02561-JFA (D.S.C. Nov. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network