DON BRADLEY WALLACE v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY LLC (2016)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

DON BRADLEY WALLACE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, LLC, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-2194

Decided: June 21, 2016

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Don Bradley Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Stephen Gallagher, SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP, Jacksonville, Florida, for Appellee.

Don Bradley Wallace appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint asserting claims under the Telephone Consumer Protect Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (2012).^* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Schatz v. Rosenberg, 943 F.2d 485, 487 n.1 (4th Cir. 1991) (“We must review the district court's decision on the same record as that before the district court.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order, deny Wallace's motions to supplement the record on appeal, to seal some of those documents, and to clarify, and deny the Appellee's motion to strike portions of Wallace's opening brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

FOOTNOTES

FOOTNOTE. Wallace abandoned in the district court the remaining claims asserted in the complaint.

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law