IN RE: ROBERT PADULA; DEBORAH PADULA (2016)

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

IN RE: ROBERT PADULA; DEBORAH PADULA, Debtors. VPSI, INC., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DEBORAH PADULA, Defendant - Appellee. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEYS, Amicus Supporting Appellee.

No. 15-2114

Decided: June 09, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Heather S. Deane, Adam D. Michel, BONNER, KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. John T. Donelan, LAW OFFICE OF JOHN T. DONELAN, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Tara Twomey, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMER BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEYS, J. Erick Heath, On Brief, San Jose, California, for Amicus Curiae.

VPSI, Inc., appeals the district court's order affirming the bankruptcy court's order granting the debtor's motion for authorization to pursue a state court personal injury suit. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties' briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the courts below. See VPSI, Inc. v. Padula, No. 1:15-cv-00612-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 21, 2015); No. 11-12985-BFK (E.D. Va. Apr. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law