IN RE: Marcus WHITE (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

IN RE: Marcus WHITE, Petitioner

No. 20-3196

Decided: November 17, 2020

Before: JORDAN, KRAUSE and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges

Marcus White, Pro Se Joel D. Goldstein, Esq., Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq., Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff - Respondent

OPINION *

Marcus White has again filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in an attempt to challenge the jurisdictional basis of his federal convictions and sentence. For substantially the reasons we recently set forth in In re White, 823 F. App'x 121 (3d Cir. 2020) (per curiam), the mandamus petition will be denied. White is warned that abuse of the writ of mandamus will result in the Court's consideration of sanctions.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network