IN RE: C. Tate GEORGE (2020)

OPINION *

In January 2020, C. Tate George filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, asking us to direct the District Court to rule on a motion to vacate sentence that he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On May 26, 2020, the District Court denied the § 2255 motion. See ECF 66, 67. Because George has now obtained the relief that he seeks in his mandamus petition, we will dismiss the petition as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff's personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”).

PER CURIAM