Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ronald P. BOYLES, Jr., Appellant v. AMERICAN HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a Allstate Benefits, a/k/a Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York; Jeffrey Azzato; St. Marys Insurance Agency, Inc.; Unum Life Insurance Company of America, a/k/a Unum Group
OPINION *
After a series of back surgeries, Ronald P. Boyles, Jr. was left with lingering health issues that eventually ended his employment relationship with St. Marys Insurance Agency, Inc., and its president and co-owner, Jeffrey Azzato. Boyles tried to secure disability benefits under two group insurance policies sponsored at different times by St. Marys and issued by third-party insurers. The disability insurers denied his claims.
Boyles sued St. Marys, Azzato, and the disability insurers. In the only two counts at issue,1 Boyles alleged that St. Marys and Azzato breached fiduciary duties owed to him under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The District Court granted summary judgment to those two remaining defendants.2 Boyles v. Am. Heritage Life Ins. Co., 383 F. Supp. 3d 470 (W.D. Pa. 2019). We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the District Court in its thorough and well-reasoned opinion.
FOOTNOTES
1. To the extent Boyles preserved a third count, for respondeat superior liability against St. Marys, we need not reach it based on our disposition of the fiduciary duty claims.
2. ERISA provided the District Court with jurisdiction. 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)–(f); Mushalla v. Teamsters Local No. 863 Pension Fund, 300 F.3d 391, 395 (3d Cir. 2002). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review of the summary judgment decision is de novo. Mushalla, 300 F.3d at 395.
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-2145
Decided: June 19, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)