Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CARL E. RODGERS, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE; JEFFREY STINE; DEAN SHIPE; SCOTT DENISCH; SEAN MOYER; MARK MAGYAR; JOHN DOES
ORDER
Due to typographical errors in the opinion, as further outlined below, an amended opinion will be issued to correct said errors. At footnote 5, the text “Camiolo governs our analysis and it forecloses Rodgers' argument” has been added to the end of the footnote as it was inadvertently omitted in the published opinion. “Rodgers's” at the end of page 4 of the opinion has been changed to “Rogers’ ”. No other amendments were made. The Clerk is directed to file the amended opinion. As these changes do not affect the judgment, the judgment will remain as filed.
By the Court,
Tmm/cc: Christopher E. Fisher, Esq.
Joseph G. Muzic Jr., Esq.
Michael J. Scarinci, Esq
Cindy K. Chung Circuit Judge
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 24-1759
Decided: March 07, 2025
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)