Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Frank PICONE, Defendant-Appellant.
SUMMARY ORDER
Defendant-Appellant Frank Picone (“Picone”) pleaded guilty to receipt of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252(a)(2) and 2252(b)(1). Picone was sentenced to 170 months’ imprisonment and five years’ supervised release, and ordered to pay $10,000 in restitution, $5,100 in special assessments, and a fine of $250,000. On appeal, Picone challenges only the procedural reasonableness of the imposition of the fine. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.
We note at the outset the Government’s concession that Picone’s waiver of his right to appeal, agreed to as part of his guilty plea, does not sweep broadly enough to preclude an appeal of the fine imposed by the District Court.
On the current record, we cannot determine whether the District Court appropriately considered the impact that the imposed fine would have on Picone’s financial dependents, specifically his wife. Consideration of this factor is mandatory under 18 U.S.C. § 3572(a)(2) (the District Court must consider “the burden that the fine will impose upon ․ any person who is financially dependent on the defendant”).
Accordingly, we remand pursuant to the procedure described in United States v. Jacobson, 15 F.3d 19, 22 (2d Cir. 1994), so that the District Court may conduct additional fact-finding on the record on this narrow issue. The District Court is hereby authorized to amend the fine if this is indicated by the Court’s mandated inquiry into “the burden that the fine will impose” on Picone’s wife. 18 U.S.C. § 3572(a)(2).
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, we REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this order.
Because Picone is required to pay his fine during the period of his imprisonment, the mandate shall issue forthwith, and the District Court shall conduct any necessary additional proceedings as soon as practicable. This appeal will be reinstated, without need for a new notice of appeal, upon notice by either side to the Clerk of Court, whereupon jurisdiction will be restored to this Court and to this panel.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 18-3169-cr
Decided: February 13, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)