AINET CORPORATION v. XEROX STATE LOCAL SOLUTIONS INC (2018)

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant AiNET Corporation (“AiNET”) appeals the order of the District Court denying its motion for reconsideration of the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the District Court following a two-day bench trial. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

“It is well settled that an appeal from an order denying a [motion for reconsideration] brings up for review only the denial of the motion and not the merits of the underlying judgment for errors that could have been asserted on direct appeal.” Lora v. O'Heaney, 602 F.3d 106, 111 (2d Cir. 2010) (citation, alteration, and internal quotation marks omitted). A district court's denial of a motion for reconsideration is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Trikona Advisers Ltd. v. Chugh, 846 F.3d 22, 29 (2d Cir. 2017). After reviewing the record, we find no abuse of discretion, much less error, in the denial of AiNET's motion for reconsideration, and affirm the District Court's order for substantially the same reasons as those given by the District Court.

CONCLUSION

We have reviewed all of the arguments raised by Plaintiff-Appellant on appeal and find them to be without merit. The November 6, 2017 order of the District Court is AFFIRMED.