Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Laurence R. and Arline P. GREEN, and Joseph E. and Judith T. Gentle, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.
Laurence and Arline Green and Joseph and Judith Gentle appeal from decisions of the Tax Court holding that benefits they received under the Connecticut Heart and Hypertension Act, Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 7-433c (West 1989), are part of gross income for federal tax purposes. Benefits are paid under Section 7-433c to firefighters and police officers who suffer “either off duty or on duty any condition or impairment of health caused by hypertension or heart disease.” Id. The Greens and the Gentles argue that such benefits should be exempt from taxation under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and regulations because the Connecticut act is “a statute in the nature of a workmen's compensation act which provides compensation to employees for personal injuries or sickness incurred in the course of employment.” 26 C.F.R. § 1.104-1(b).
However, a statute that provides benefits to ailing employees is not considered to be “in the nature of a workmen's compensation act” unless the benefits are paid for ailments that are work-related. As we noted in Rutter v. Commissioner, 760 F.2d 466 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848, 106 S.Ct. 141, 88 L.Ed.2d 116 (1985), “[u]nless a statute contains some provision restricting the payment of benefits to cases of work-related disabilities, it is not in the nature of a workmen's compensation statute.” Id. at 468; see also Take v. Commissioner, 804 F.2d 553 (9th Cir.1986). Because Section 7-433c provides benefits to police officers and firefighters who suffer from hypertension and heart disease whether or not those conditions are work-related, benefits paid thereunder are part of gross income.
We therefore affirm.
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 1551, Docket 94-4214.
Decided: July 21, 1995
Court: United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)