UNITED STATES v. ESTERAS ROSADO (2017)

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Eduardo ESTERAS-ROSADO, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 16-1903

Decided: January 24, 2017

Before Howard, Chief Judge, Torruella and Thompson, Circuit Judges.

Mariana E. Bauza Almonte, Maritza Gonzalez–Rivera, US Attorney's Office, San Juan, PR, for Appellee. Alejandro Jose Cepeda–Diaz, McConnell Valdes LLC, Anita Hill-Adames, Anita Hill Law Office, San Juan, PR, Eduardo Esteras–Rosado, Catano, PR, for Defendant, Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Eduardo Esteras-Rosado appeals pro se from the district court's interlocutory order denying his motion to dismiss the criminal indictment based on purported speedy trial violations. We DISMISS the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because such orders are not immediately appealable under these circumstances. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292; see United States v. Kane, 955 F.2d 110, 110-111 (1st Cir. 1992) (per curiam); United States v. Moller-Butcher, 723 F.2d 189, 190-91 (1st Cir. 1983). Defendant's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as moot.

Dismissed.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network