UNITED STATES v. CALVILLO (2020)

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose A. CALVILLO, a.k.a. Franco de Villa, a.k.a. Ruben Martinez, a.k.a. Martinpuga, a.k.a. Tobias Franco, a.k.a. Nervios, a.k.a. Primo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-14908

Decided: November 17, 2020

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, JILL PRYOR and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

Nicholas Joseph Hartigan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Jane Elizabeth McBath, U.S. Attorney Service - Northern District of Georgia, U.S. Attorney's Office, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee Jose A. Calvillo, Pro Se

Sydney Strickland, appointed counsel for Jose Calvillo in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Calvillo and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Strickland's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, Strickland's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Calvillo's conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network