Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marnika LEWIS, Antoin Adams, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Greater Birmingham Ministries, Marika Coleman, John Rogers, Priscilla Dunn, Juandalynn Givan, Louise Alexander, William Muhammad, Rodger Smitherman, Oliver Robinson, Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, Mary Moore, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, in their Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama, Attorney General, State of Alabama, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama, State of Alabama, The, Birmingham, City of, the, Mayor of Birmingham, in his official Capacity as Mayor of Birmingham., Defendants-Appellees.
This panel's opinion in Lewis v. Governor of Alabama, 896 F.3d 1282 (11th Cir. 2018), was vacated for rehearing en banc, 914 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2019). On rehearing, the en banc court addressed the employee-plaintiffs’ Article III standing to sue the Alabama Attorney General for Act No. 2016-18’s alleged violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Lewis v. Governor of Ala., 944 F.3d 1287, 1292 (11th Cir. 2019) (en banc). It held that the “plaintiffs lack Article III standing to bring their equal-protection claim against the Alabama Attorney General,” and therefore did not consider the claim's merits. Id. at 1306. The en banc court affirmed the panel opinion in part and remanded to the panel. Id. For the reasons given in the en banc opinion, we affirm the district court's dismissal of the plaintiffs’ claims against the Alabama Attorney General for lack of jurisdiction. That reasoning applies equally to the plaintiffs’ standing to sue the State of Alabama, so we affirm the district court's dismissal there too. And for the reasons we gave in the panel opinion—with which the en banc court expressed no disagreement—we affirm the district court's dismissal of the City of Birmingham from the suit. See Lewis, 896 F.3d at 1291.
AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-11009
Decided: August 10, 2020
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)