Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Diego Armando CANCINO-MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Pursuant to a plea agreement, Diego Armando Cancino-Mendez pled guilty to conspiracy to possess, with intent to distribute, five kilograms or more of cocaine on board a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, in violation of 46 U.S.C. §§ 70506(b) and 70503(a)(1),1 and the district court sentenced to 135-months’ imprisonment, a sentence at the low end of the Guidelines sentence range of 135-168 months. He appeals his sentence, arguing that it is substantively unreasonable; the court should have varied downward based on mitigating factors, including his role in the offense and his history and characteristics. We affirm.
We review Cancino-Mendez’s sentence for abuse of discretion. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). A sentence under the Guidelines must be “sufficient, but not greater than necessary to comply with the purposes” of sentencing listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). They include the need to reflect the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, provide just punishment, deter criminal conduct, and protect the public from the defendant’s future criminal conduct. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2). The court also considers the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant. The weight to be given to these factors is committed to the court’s sound discretion. United States v. Clay, 483 F.3d 739, 743 (11th Cir. 2007).
The district court did not abuse its discretion in this case. It carefully considered the § 3553(a) purposes of sentences--in particular, the need of the sentence to deter criminal conduct and reflect the seriousness of the conspiracy offense--and the mitigating circumstances Cancino-Mendez presented. It then imposed a sentence at the low end of the Guidelines sentence range and well below the maximum penalty provided by statute.
AFFIRMED.
FOOTNOTES
1. Cancino-Mendez was aboard a go-fast boat on the high seas 87 nautical miles from the Mexico/Guatemala boarder. The boat was carrying bales of cocaine. The U.S. Coast Guard intercepted the boat and took Cancino-Mendez and others into custody.
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 19-10700
Decided: September 10, 2019
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)