Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric BISHOP, Defendant-Appellant.
Eric Bishop appeals his sentence of 210 months of imprisonment following his plea of guilty to attempting to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Bishop argues that his sentence at the high end of his advisory guideline range is substantively unreasonable. We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it sentenced Bishop to a sentence at the high end of his guideline range based on the seriousness of his offense and the need to protect minors. Bishop traveled to have sex with a five-year-old girl who he thought was autistic and would be unlikely to report the abuse. After his arrest, Bishop admitted that he was “close” to succumbing to his desire to molest his two-year-old daughter because she was nonverbal and that he had contacted at least five other persons in an attempt to arrange sexual trysts with their children. Bishop had a sentencing range between 168 and 210 months of imprisonment based on his criminal history of I and an offense level of 35, which accounted for his use of the internet and his cellular telephone in committing the crime and the age of his intended victim. The district court reasonably accorded heavy weight to Bishop’s intention to prey on a child with a disability and his fantasies about abusing very young girls. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). And the district court stated that it would have varied above Bishop’s guideline range but for his history of mental-health issues, attempts to commit suicide, lack of criminal history, successful employment, family support, low likelihood of reoffending, and potential for rehabilitation. We cannot say that the district court committed a clear error of judgment in balancing the statutory sentencing factors. See United States v. Irey, 612 F.3d 1160, 1189 (11th Cir. 2010) (en banc). Bishop’s sentence, which is well below his statutory maximum penalty of life imprisonment, is reasonable. See United States v. Gonzalez, 550 F.3d 1319, 1324 (11th Cir. 2008).
We AFFIRM Bishop’s sentence.
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 18-10532
Decided: August 31, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)