Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lincoln MOODY, aka Rateek Allah, Defendant-Appellant.
Rateek Allah, formerly known as Lincoln Moody, appeals pro se the denial of his motion for compassionate release. The district court ruled that it “lack[ed] jurisdiction to consider the [m]otion,” and Allah does not challenge that ruling. As the district court explained, a “court may not modify a term of imprisonment once it has been imposed” based on the health of a prisoner unless the request is made “upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We affirm, but we remand for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to modify its order to reflect that Allah’s motion is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
AFFIRMED WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT.
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 17-13756
Decided: July 10, 2018
Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)